On this page
Two distinct implant steel families
One of the most familiar implant steel designations is 1.4441 / S31673. It is a low-carbon chromium-nickel-molybdenum steel associated with ASTM F138 and ISO 5832-1. The name 316LVM also appears in this field, but similar constituent elements do not make an ordinary 316L bar the same implant material.
Grade 1.4472 / S31675 is a different austenitic steel, nitrogen-strengthened and associated with ASTM F1586 and ISO 5832-9. Its chromium, manganese and nitrogen ranges differ from 1.4441. Their shared use in medical applications does not establish identical chemistry or mechanical properties.
Where does the alloy difference become clear?
Nitrogen is a defined part of the 1.4472 composition and contributes to strengthening the austenitic structure. Chromium is also higher than in 1.4441. This approach is relevant to medical components where available section size is limited and mechanical properties matter. Nitrogen is more than a suffix in the name: it is one reason to treat the material as a distinct family.
The table summarises the principal identities and distinguishing composition features. Mechanical acceptance values depend on product form and delivery condition, so a single strength figure is not assigned to each family. Annealed, medium-hard and hard delivery conditions can produce different properties within the same material designation.
| Designation | 1.4441 / S31673 | 1.4472 / S31675 |
|---|---|---|
| Associated ASTM | F138 | F1586 |
| Associated ISO | 5832-1 | 5832-9 |
| Principal feature | Low-carbon Cr-Ni-Mo implant steel | Nitrogen-strengthened implant steel |
| Difference between families | Also associated with the name 316LVM | Higher Cr, Mn and N ranges |
A specification number is not an AISI grade
F138 and F1586 are not AISI grade codes. They identify product specifications. F138 covers bar and wire for surgical implants, while F1586 concerns nitrogen-strengthened bar material. A material number, a UNS designation and a product specification therefore convey different information rather than repeating the same name three times.
Commercial names form another layer. A name such as REX 734 may be associated with a material family, but additional properties of an individual producer version do not automatically apply to every product. This comparison explains the material families; it does not describe a specific producer product or certified batch.
Material conformity and device suitability
These steels are defined for surgical implants and related medical components. Meeting the chemical limits of a raw-material specification does not by itself establish that a finished medical device meets every applicable requirement. Component geometry, surface condition and intended use remain relevant to assessment of the device.
The distinction between 1.4441 and 1.4472 cannot be reduced to choosing the higher strength number. The material specification, the properties expected by the existing design and the delivery condition all matter. Identifying these as separate grades makes an otherwise confusing difference between apparently similar stainless steels easier to understand.